Answers Page | Ask a Question | Old Questions | Latest Questions

421 entries
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next

Name: GK
Website: www
Date: 25 Oct 19 04:15pm
This questions page has been discontinued.

For all new questions please go to askphilosopher.blogspot.com.

If you are subscribed to the askaphilosopher e-list then you will receive each new question directly into your Inbox.

Thanks!

Geoffrey Klempner
Name: Sierra
Website: n/a
Date: 24 Oct 19 10:54pm
Knowledge is a puzzling bottomless pit that much like our Universe seems endless yet confined. How can people test Knowledge without studying Philosophy? If people can test Knowledge without ever considering it Philosophically, then is Knowledge learned in school false if not all things taught are based in justified true belief?
Name: Frank
Website: n/a
Date: 22 Oct 19 11:08pm
How would you estimate the chances for Brexit now that this evening the UK Parliament has agreed in principle to Boris Johnson's EU Withdrawal Bill?
Name: Umberto
Website: n/a
Date: 20 Oct 19 10:13am
Does "a priori knowledge" depend on the existence of "abstract objects"? if nominalism is true then is all knowledge empirical ("a posteriori")?
Name: Samuel
Website: n/a
Date: 19 Oct 19 08:30am
To what extent is solipsism a relevant philosophical theory in modern society?

I have determined it to be irrelevant in an ethical sense but not in a philosophical one.
Name: Luka
Website: n/a
Date: 18 Oct 19 05:53pm
Hello. Can you tell me briefly about philosophy of Soren Kierkegaard, and where to start reading him? Fear and trembling or some other work? Thank you!
Name: Margalouise
Website: n/a
Date: 17 Oct 19 10:03am
Where do logical empiricism, falsification and Kuhn's theory collide with each other, and what makes them different?
Name: Umberto
Website: n/a
Date: 17 Oct 19 08:19am
I wonder if it is necessary to believe in "abstract ideas", "abstract objects" and "universals" to believe in "a priori knowledge"? Is there any contradiction in being a nominalist and a Kantian epistemologist?
Name: Sarah
Website: n/a
Date: 11 Oct 19 09:27am
What philosophical difference between Plato and Marx helps us understand why history is important for Marx but not for Plato?
Name: James
Website: n/a
Date: 10 Oct 19 08:42am
For Catriona Mackenzie, what is the self? What role does the imagination play in forming/ defining/ altering the self?
Name: James
Website: n/a
Date: 10 Oct 19 08:41am
In "What We Believe Ourselves To Be, " Parfit states that "I ought to regard having a Replica as being about as good as ordinary survival" (180). What does he mean by this and what might be some of the reasons that lead to this conclusion?
Name: Jhonross
Website: n/a
Date: 09 Oct 19 08:47am
Who is the father of philosophy?
Name: John
Website: n/a
Date: 07 Oct 19 07:20pm
Is Aristotelean ethics, subjectivism? just like how can we see what is good or bad based from our reasons, and it does not have any moral guidelines?
Name: Jay
Website: n/a
Date: 07 Oct 19 10:07am
In 'The Dilemma of Determinism', how does William James see his position as better than the alternative?

What are some examples of how he tries to convince a person of his point?

What is a 'postulate of rationality' and what role does it play in what we accept as true or not?

What is the point James is ultimately trying to make?
Name: Arlha
Website: n/a
Date: 06 Oct 19 02:39pm
I hope you can explain the three logically independent but also interdependent bases or axes of variability according to Talcott Parsons in layman's terms:

1. a distinction between the structural and the functional

2. a distinction between the two dynamic processes of maintaining system equilibrium and structural change in the system

3. the hierarchy of relations of control
Name: Peter
Website: n/a
Date: 06 Oct 19 02:38pm
Should human sexual reproduction be made illegal?
Name: Ethan
Website: n/a
Date: 06 Oct 19 09:32am
I'm set to enlist in the Israel Defense Forces but I have the option of not serving if I want to (by acquiring an exemption) so I was debating whether it would be morally right to serve or not. I came to the conclusion that it would be morally wrong to serve because of the unjustified harm it would cause to Palestinians. But here's the problem, if I think it's immoral to serve if given the option not to, I would then have to say that anyone with the option to not serve shouldn't. But if everyone with the choice to not serve didn't serve the military would collapse and a war would ensue causing more deaths than there would've been if people had served. Does that then make my claim that it is immoral to serve in the military wrong?
Name: Guy
Website: n/a
Date: 04 Oct 19 06:37pm
Is it part of any commentary on Godel's incompleteness theorems that, even if it can be conceived that a 'stronger' or 'higher-order' logical-mathematical language could supersede human formal axiomatic systems (surely - rather than simply 'resolving' their 'incoherences'), in fact, were an angel or alien to present this language to us, the fundamental nature and limits of human cognition mean we would be unable to recognise and make use of it? Is this Hofstadter's position, for example? And is further part of such comment that this 'stronger' language would (or might) itself have to refer to a yet 'higher system' to prove its own coherence, in a potentially infinite regression?
Name: Esther
Website: n/a
Date: 30 Sep 19 07:00pm
How will you join the theory of existentialism with euthanasia?
Name: Jhayvee
Website: n/a
Date: 24 Sep 19 08:45am
Can a person have essence? If personal identity is determined by a thinker's memories and expectations, can any of these be essential, or must they not all be accidental?